Re: Is border-color animatable?

I think every property should have its own page.
However, if you eventually decide that border-x-color will not have their
own pages, border-x-color should at the very least redirect to border-color.


☆*PhistucK*


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mike Sierra <
letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> wrote:

> The border-color property is definitely animatable despite whatever error
> suggests otherwise. By "individual values," do you mean the "longhand"
> properties targeting each side of the box?  IMO it would be a bad idea to
> have separate pages for border-left-color, border-top-color, etc. That they
> share the same behavior is implicit, so no need for anything but a yes/no
> for the animatable flag.  However, shorthand properties like "border" do
> require separate pages. Hope that's what you mean.
>
> --Mike S
>
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, folks:
>>
>> Our CSS properties template provides for a yes/no value: a checkbox if
>> something is animatable.[1] border-color is not listed as animatable in the
>> CSS transitions spec, but all of its values are.[2]
>>
>> I'm thinking of keeping that value as "no", but then adding a note in
>> usage.
>>
>> I would put individual values, linked, within the field, but obviously
>> that won't work with the type of toggle field that it is. I'm hesitant to
>> create a bug against the field type. (But then, I'd also want to file a
>> markup bug against the string field because linking doesn't work.)
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Julee
>> [1]
>> http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=css/properties/border-color&action=formedit
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#animatable-css
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>
>