W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Is border-color animatable?

From: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 07:19:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAECD241TKvDQ8sCrsseaj7GPRi3w3C-tYa8K8RmqwoPwYb_OYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Greg Whitworth <gkwinspired@gmail.com>
The border-color property is definitely animatable despite whatever error
suggests otherwise. By "individual values," do you mean the "longhand"
properties targeting each side of the box?  IMO it would be a bad idea to
have separate pages for border-left-color, border-top-color, etc. That they
share the same behavior is implicit, so no need for anything but a yes/no
for the animatable flag.  However, shorthand properties like "border" do
require separate pages. Hope that's what you mean.

--Mike S

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, folks:
> Our CSS properties template provides for a yes/no value: a checkbox if
> something is animatable.[1] border-color is not listed as animatable in the
> CSS transitions spec, but all of its values are.[2]
> I'm thinking of keeping that value as "no", but then adding a note in
> usage.
> I would put individual values, linked, within the field, but obviously
> that won't work with the type of toggle field that it is. I'm hesitant to
> create a bug against the field type. (But then, I'd also want to file a
> markup bug against the string field because linking doesn't work.)
> What do you think?
> Julee
> [1]
> http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=css/properties/border-color&action=formedit
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#animatable-css
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 11:21:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:48 UTC