W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Is border-color animatable?

From: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:23:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAECD241EoJYXNAG23A_r8ph-+4FDg8JB4v2AHcP1=6BvY1EAGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
Cc: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Greg Whitworth <gkwinspired@gmail.com>
Sorry. Didn't realize longhands were being implemented, but it makes sense
given their unique CSSOM names.

--Mike S



On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think every property should have its own page.
> However, if you eventually decide that border-x-color will not have their
> own pages, border-x-color should at the very least redirect to border-color.
>
>
> ☆*PhistucK*
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mike Sierra <
> letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The border-color property is definitely animatable despite whatever error
>> suggests otherwise. By "individual values," do you mean the "longhand"
>> properties targeting each side of the box?  IMO it would be a bad idea to
>> have separate pages for border-left-color, border-top-color, etc. That they
>> share the same behavior is implicit, so no need for anything but a yes/no
>> for the animatable flag.  However, shorthand properties like "border" do
>> require separate pages. Hope that's what you mean.
>>
>> --Mike S
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, folks:
>>>
>>> Our CSS properties template provides for a yes/no value: a checkbox if
>>> something is animatable.[1] border-color is not listed as animatable in the
>>> CSS transitions spec, but all of its values are.[2]
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of keeping that value as "no", but then adding a note in
>>> usage.
>>>
>>> I would put individual values, linked, within the field, but obviously
>>> that won't work with the type of toggle field that it is. I'm hesitant to
>>> create a bug against the field type. (But then, I'd also want to file a
>>> markup bug against the string field because linking doesn't work.)
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Julee
>>> [1]
>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=css/properties/border-color&action=formedit
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#animatable-css
>>> ----------------------------
>>> julee@adobe.com
>>> @adobejulee
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 13:23:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:48 UTC