- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:21:41 -0700
- To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
- Cc: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPq7bFAc_pmJaM0FB6zHvWYy3wwPzjsCYwKHaw_4+8dhBA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Julee, I removed the second "DOM Reference pages" under "Content items for later." The distinction/stipulation about having URLs is sufficient as is, says I. On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, Scott: > > Good point. It was my understanding that the Content project team would > validate, flesh out, and recirculate a finalized list. > > So maybe do you want to fix the typo and add that distinction? > > Julee > ---------------------------- > julee@adobe.com > @adobejulee > > From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> > Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:20 PM > To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com> > Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Doug > Schepers <schepers@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Beta and Beyond > > hi all, > > I think that there is a typo under "Content items for later" where DOM > reference pages are cited - both here and under "Content Items." > > My guess is that we won't have a complete DOM API reference, though > meeting all of the goals for content is not unrealistic, but we should at > least set the goal of having the pages organized in a coherent hierarchy > delineated in the URLs. > > +Scott > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote: > >> Hi, everyone: >> >> At today's community meeting we reviewed >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status and, barring any >> objections, we agreed to move ahead with it. >> >> Regards. >> >> Julee >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> >> Organization: W3C >> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:36 PM >> To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Subject: Beta and Beyond >> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:37 PM >> >> >Hi, folks- >> > >> >Julee, Eliot, and I met on Friday to start to lock down our Beta >> >requirements and schedule. The gist (which should surprise nobody) is >> >that we will be making project for each "activity" in the project >> >management system (Bug Genie) >> > >> >Our Beta criteria will be focused on Infrastructure, Content, and >> >Community goals. >> > >> >We would like to establish a timeline for each project based on our >> >community discussion evaluation of the time needed, so please help >> >refine our rough notes here: >> > >> >http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status >> > >> >With a week or so, we hope to have several projects entered into >> >project.webplatform.org, and we'll use that as a starting point for >> >further refinements. >> > >> >Some criteria we want to meet may not be Beta... they may be later >> >goals. We should still list them and keep track of them. >> > >> >Regards- >> >-Doug >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 00:22:16 UTC