W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Notes on our chat today

From: Doug May <intuedge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 05:03:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CABPs60Eg5GbhXvOFADP4eEcRRtpE20-=bq5Ct-NGDyDNB-JhVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, public-webplatform@w3.org
Hi, Julee.

I definitely vote for stubbing in the missing pages, with a clear
caveat about missing info, an indication of relative priority, an
invitation/links to contribute (getting started and checkout), and
ideally a way to vote the priority up or down.

I missed most of Friday's call.  Is there a place to locate the
recording, or the IRC capture?


> We'd then break down the projects in the bug genie. For example, with
> caniuse, we want to map that structure to ours so we can ensure coverage.
> 1. Generate a site map of the current site
> 2. Identify what pages should be there that aren't
> 3. Do we want to stub in those pages so users don't have to worry about
> creating them -- or creating them in the wrong places?
> Regards.
> Julee
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 13:03:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:42 UTC