- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:37:09 +0300
- To: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
- Cc: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com>, Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_LBxSAEeMrpnc+d=1ZM7FKQUH-TnW9t7RNE=aT8sj6COA@mail.gmail.com>
Right, sorry. I was tricked by the Google Chrome Developer Tools, which once showed Global as some sort of a constructor. I guess global is fine and also looks like part of the level (instead of something unrelated). I fixed it in my proposal. Thank you! ☆*PhistucK* On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, PhisktucK: Yes: Object and objects. For global, however, the spec uses > lower case for global, maybe because of it's nature.[1] J > > [1] http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.1 > ---------------------------- > julee@adobe.com > @adobejulee > > From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> > Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 9:21 AM > To: julee <julee@adobe.com> > Cc: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Janet > Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com>, WebPlatform Public List < > public-webplatform@w3.org> > > Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B > > Global and Object are part of the language (they are > constructors/objects). I intentionally left them capitalized. > > > ☆*PhistucK* > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, PhistucK & Max! >> >> I wish we would fix the capitalization on non-language words, so Object, >> object, global. >> >> But other than that, I think we've discussed most of this issues and that >> the next step is to get some language experts to review it. >> >> Doug: you mentioned passing this by Julien and Rick Byers? And Janet, you >> mentioned Dave Brouant? >> >> Regards. >> >> Julee >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> >> >> >> >> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:22 AM >> To: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com> >> Cc: julee <julee@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >> public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B >> >> >> I added my proposal - >> >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript#Path_rewriting_proposal >> >> >> >> >> ☆PhistucK >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I finished the two things asked for, >> please have a look at it now: >> >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript >> >> On 7/13/2013 2:49 PM, Julee wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, Max! A couple of things: >> >> >> 1. I would think we do want to doc 5.1.[1] >> >> 2. Can we put the hierarchy as you've been working it >> out[2] directly in the document. That way, the reviewers >> we are lining up can get it all from one page. >> >> >> Regards. >> >> >> Julee >> >> >> [1] http://kangax.github.io/es5-compat-table/ >> >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2013Jul/0002.html >> >> >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com> >> Date: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:12 AM >> To: julee <julee@adobe.com> >> Cc: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, >> Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B >> >> >> >> >> >> There was no parent page to the >> javascript/reference, so I just made it javascript: >> >> >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [...snip...] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 16:38:17 UTC