- From: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:39 -0700
- To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, Julee <julee@adobe.com>
- CC: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com>, Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CE169F0C.88F83%jburdeki@adobe.com>
Hi, PhisktucK: Yes: Object and objects. For global, however, the spec uses lower case for global, maybe because of it's nature.[1] J [1] http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.1 ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com @adobejulee From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 9:21 AM To: julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>> Cc: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org<mailto:schepers@w3.org>>, Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com<mailto:jswisher@mozilla.com>>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>> Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B Global and Object are part of the language (they are constructors/objects). I intentionally left them capitalized. ☆PhistucK On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>> wrote: Thanks, PhistucK & Max! I wish we would fix the capitalization on non-language words, so Object, object, global. But other than that, I think we've discussed most of this issues and that the next step is to get some language experts to review it. Doug: you mentioned passing this by Julien and Rick Byers? And Janet, you mentioned Dave Brouant? Regards. Julee ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com> @adobejulee From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013<tel:2013> 2:22 AM To: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>> Cc: julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>> Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B I added my proposal - http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript#Path_rewriting_proposal ☆PhistucK On Thu, Jul 25, 2013<tel:2013> at 6:26 AM, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>> wrote: I finished the two things asked for, please have a look at it now: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript On 7/13/2013 2:49 PM, Julee wrote: Thanks, Max! A couple of things: 1. I would think we do want to doc 5.1.[1] 2. Can we put the hierarchy as you've been working it out[2] directly in the document. That way, the reviewers we are lining up can get it all from one page. Regards. Julee [1] http://kangax.github.io/es5-compat-table/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2013Jul/0002.html ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com> @adobejulee From: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>> Date: Saturday, July 13, 2013<tel:2013> 10:12 AM To: julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>> Cc: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>>, Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>> Subject: Re: JavaScript page naming, round B There was no parent page to the javascript/reference, so I just made it javascript: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript [...snip...]
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 16:27:08 UTC