- From: Sarah Forst <sarah.plowright@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:37:33 -0400
- To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKs_O5Ycs9Vkjn=JuqupwB-mAz5mL4D70my328LemsCwt+Q=3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Ah okay, I missed that page when reading the instructions, checking quickly, it looks like it does follow those guidelines, but I will double check and rewrite the content where it makes sense. Thank you, Sarah On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) < Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> wrote: > Microsoft contributed a substantial amount of text to Web Platform Docs > on the understanding that the attribution would at the page level. > > You can take content word for word from the text that Microsoft and > other contributors explicitly offered to WPD. (Harvesting new material > from MSDN, MSN, HTML5 Rocks, etc. is another discussion) The whole point > of WPD is to have a community mash up content from multiple sources, keep > it up to date, and add value with code samples, implementation reports, > etc. That will inevitably change the original content to the point where > it would be burdensome on the community to track where each nugget of > information came from. > > > Michael Champion > > Sr. Program Manager > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. > > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sarah Forst <sarah.plowright@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:19 AM > *To:* public-webplatform@w3.org > *Subject:* External Sources of Copy > > Hi - > > Apologies for all of the questions, but I had some concerns about > content reuse on the page I'm editing: > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/clear which I signed up > for last web platform wednesday but discovered someone else had already > filled out the content. > > A large portion of the content from: > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/clear, and I think some > of the other content is from Microsoft. > > It's my understanding that since web platform is associated with the > w3c, reusing content from there is okay, but it seems somewhat dubious to > me to take content word for word from mozilla and microsoft. There is an > attribution at the bottom: > > "*This article contains content originally from external sources.* > > Portions of this content come from the Mozilla Developer Network [image: > cc-by-sa-small-wpd.svg]<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/> > : Article <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/CSS/clear> > > Portions of this content come from the Microsoft Developer Network: Windows > Internet Explorer API reference Article<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/hh828809%28v=vs.85%29.aspx> > " > But to me, attributions like that should only be used for quoted > sections, not the majority of a documents copy. What is the policy on this > for web platform? > > Thanks, > Sarah >
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 15:38:02 UTC