Re: <position> data type

While really weird... since this is actually defined this way in the
specification, I agree.


☆*PhistucK*


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was about to create a page for the <position> data type, but I saw it
> already exists [1] and Sierra marked it as a deletion candidate, because
> "folded coordinate content into css/units/length"
>
> However, not only there is nothing about it in length [2], but I disagree
> with those two being merged. <position> is a separate data type, defined
> separately in CSS Values and Units [3]. If there are no objections, I'd
> like to reinstate and edit [1].
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/data_types/position
> [2]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/data_types/length
> [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#position
>
> Lea Verou
> W3C developer relations
> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou
>
>
>
>
>
>
>