- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:43:40 -0700
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPwaZpVkRsqdfgnKQ5wxnFU6buy1Q-51fXhej3A9b7-oXj1RuQ@mail.gmail.com>
I personally don't know if it's a big enough deal to warrant the extra work to migrate pages. For what it's worth, Wikipedia's meta namespace is Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, Julee- > > > On 4/15/13 11:41 AM, Julee wrote: > >> I thought meta was a parking lot that we weren't going to expose to >> search, etc. If that's the case, how will changing the WPD namespace to >> Meta affect that experience? Thanks. J >> > > Well, the Meta namespace was just a temporary placeholder at that time... > any stuff still there should either be integrated, deleted, or moved. > > Regards- > -Doug > > ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com <mailto:scottrowe@google.com>> >> >> Date: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:16 AM >> To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org <mailto:schepers@w3.org>> >> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**org<public-webplatform@w3.org> >> >" >> <public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**org<public-webplatform@w3.org> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: WPD Namespace (was: Place to put bug genie documentation.) >> >> +1 >> "Meta" is cool with me. >> ~Scott >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org >> <mailto:schepers@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, folks- >> >> All this talk about the "WPD:" namespace reminded me that the >> designation itself is a bit strange. I don't remember exactly why we >> decided to use that prefix (it was probably some quirk of mine), but >> before we go too much further... maybe we should change it to >> something a bit less opaque, so we don't have to explain it to people? >> >> We have the "Meta:" namespace prefix available, and that seems a bit >> more intuitive. >> >> At the risk of starting a naming debate... what would people think >> about changing "WPD:" pages to "Meta:" (with a redirect)? >> >> Regards- >> -Doug >> >> On 4/12/13 1:47 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote: >> >> I was thinking more along the lines of: >> * WPD:Contributors_Guide >> ** Editing >> *** Getting Started >> ** Project Mangement >> *** Filing an issue >> *** Voting on issues >> *** Editing an issues attributes >> ** Design >> >> With each lower level in the list simply being a sub-folder ( / >> separator, we don't really use folders but that is the only >> thing I can >> think to call it.) Doing WPD: so much just gets very repetitive >> very >> quickly, and wouldn't even work doing >> WPD:Project_Management/WPD:__**Projects. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:44:28 UTC