- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:18:22 -0400
- To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
- CC: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Hi, Julee- On 4/15/13 11:41 AM, Julee wrote: > I thought meta was a parking lot that we weren't going to expose to > search, etc. If that's the case, how will changing the WPD namespace to > Meta affect that experience? Thanks. J Well, the Meta namespace was just a temporary placeholder at that time... any stuff still there should either be integrated, deleted, or moved. Regards- -Doug > ---------------------------- > julee@adobe.com > @adobejulee > > From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com <mailto:scottrowe@google.com>> > Date: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:16 AM > To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org <mailto:schepers@w3.org>> > Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>" > <public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>> > Subject: Re: WPD Namespace (was: Place to put bug genie documentation.) > > +1 > "Meta" is cool with me. > ~Scott > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org > <mailto:schepers@w3.org>> wrote: > > Hi, folks- > > All this talk about the "WPD:" namespace reminded me that the > designation itself is a bit strange. I don't remember exactly why we > decided to use that prefix (it was probably some quirk of mine), but > before we go too much further... maybe we should change it to > something a bit less opaque, so we don't have to explain it to people? > > We have the "Meta:" namespace prefix available, and that seems a bit > more intuitive. > > At the risk of starting a naming debate... what would people think > about changing "WPD:" pages to "Meta:" (with a redirect)? > > Regards- > -Doug > > On 4/12/13 1:47 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote: > > I was thinking more along the lines of: > * WPD:Contributors_Guide > ** Editing > *** Getting Started > ** Project Mangement > *** Filing an issue > *** Voting on issues > *** Editing an issues attributes > ** Design > > With each lower level in the list simply being a sub-folder ( / > separator, we don't really use folders but that is the only > thing I can > think to call it.) Doing WPD: so much just gets very repetitive very > quickly, and wouldn't even work doing > WPD:Project_Management/WPD:__Projects. > > > > >
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 16:18:33 UTC