Re: Proposal: creation of a WebID json-ld context, as a CG work item

So far:

3 +1s

No NACKs

I'll leave this thread open for a while

But I'd like to start some work on this.  I already have a use case in
mind, which is profiles for "autonomous agents" (ie bots)

Aaron, I hope it's OK to take your sketch as a starting point.  If not,
just say

We'll need a version control area where members of the group can merge pull
requests.  If anyone knows a good place, feel free to add

Else we can start working in a random github repo, and transfer it to a
better spot later...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 20:34, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 18:14, Aaron Coburn <acoburn@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0055.html
>>
>
> Thanks Aaron, and also for taking the time to write create this example
> @context
>
> https://home.apache.org/~acoburn/context/webid.json
>
> See thread for full details
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:46 PM Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, it factors the arguing over semantics side away from the simple but
>>> critical bit which is consumed to make systems work
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:30 PM Melvin Carvalho <
>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This proposal is simply whether to create a JSON-LD context for WebIDs
>>>>
>>>> This suggestion brought up here:
>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0012.html
>>>>
>>>> The use case would be that it could be used in examples helping
>>>> publishers deploy WebIDs more easily
>>>>
>>>> This thread is not primarily about how, or where that should be done.
>>>> Just whether or not it should be a work item
>>>>
>>>> I think it's fairly uncontroversial, but feel free to ACK / NACK /
>>>> comment
>>>>
>>>