Re: Proposal: creation of a WebID json-ld context, as a CG work item

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 19:13, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> So far:
>
> 3 +1s
>
> No NACKs
>
> I'll leave this thread open for a while
>
> But I'd like to start some work on this.  I already have a use case in
> mind, which is profiles for "autonomous agents" (ie bots)
>
> Aaron, I hope it's OK to take your sketch as a starting point.  If not,
> just say
>
> We'll need a version control area where members of the group can merge
> pull requests.  If anyone knows a good place, feel free to add
>
> Else we can start working in a random github repo, and transfer it to a
> better spot later...
>

I've put Aaron's example in our unofficial github area.  It's not a
proposal, just an example, or template, that can be tinkered with
informally

https://github.com/webidcg/webid-context/blob/gh-pages/webid.json

The following terms are included so far:

        "Agent": "foaf:Agent",
        "Person": "foaf:Person",
        "Project": "foaf:Project",
        "Organization": "foaf:Organization",
        "PersonalProfileDocument": "foaf:PersonalProfileDocument",
        "name": "foaf:name",
        "title": "foaf:title",
        "familyName": "foaf:familyName",
        "givenName": "foaf:givenName",
        "img": "foaf:img",
        "knows": "foaf:knows",
        "primaryTopic": "foaf:primaryTopic",
        "primaryTopicOf": "foaf:primaryTopicOf"

That's from FOAF.  We could add terms from Schema, Vcard, ActivityStreams +
others

Feel free to open an issue or PR and add terms.  Anyone in this group that
wants write access can have it.


>
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 20:34, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 18:14, Aaron Coburn <acoburn@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0055.html
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Aaron, and also for taking the time to write create this example
>> @context
>>
>> https://home.apache.org/~acoburn/context/webid.json
>>
>> See thread for full details
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:46 PM Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1, it factors the arguing over semantics side away from the simple but
>>>> critical bit which is consumed to make systems work
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:30 PM Melvin Carvalho <
>>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This proposal is simply whether to create a JSON-LD context for WebIDs
>>>>>
>>>>> This suggestion brought up here:
>>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0012.html
>>>>>
>>>>> The use case would be that it could be used in examples helping
>>>>> publishers deploy WebIDs more easily
>>>>>
>>>>> This thread is not primarily about how, or where that should be done.
>>>>> Just whether or not it should be a work item
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it's fairly uncontroversial, but feel free to ACK / NACK /
>>>>> comment
>>>>>
>>>>