Re: Proposal: creation of a WebID json-ld context, as a CG work item

On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 18:14, Aaron Coburn <acoburn@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0055.html
>

Thanks Aaron, and also for taking the time to write create this example
@context

https://home.apache.org/~acoburn/context/webid.json

See thread for full details


>
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:46 PM Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>
>> +1, it factors the arguing over semantics side away from the simple but
>> critical bit which is consumed to make systems work
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:30 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This proposal is simply whether to create a JSON-LD context for WebIDs
>>>
>>> This suggestion brought up here:
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0012.html
>>>
>>> The use case would be that it could be used in examples helping
>>> publishers deploy WebIDs more easily
>>>
>>> This thread is not primarily about how, or where that should be done.
>>> Just whether or not it should be a work item
>>>
>>> I think it's fairly uncontroversial, but feel free to ACK / NACK /
>>> comment
>>>
>>