Re: Patch Subset Server Conformance Tests Finished

Sounds good.

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:22 PM Vladimir Levantovsky <
vladimir.levantovsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is excellent news, let’s plan for a demo run during our WG call.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Garret Rieger [mailto:grieger@google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 2, 2022 7:13 PM
> *To:* w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org) <
> public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Patch Subset Server Conformance Tests Finished
>
>
>
> Some exciting news, last week I finished implementing the conformance
> tests for all server side conformance statements in the spec related to the
> patch subset protocol. The tests can be found here:
> https://github.com/w3c/ift-server-tests
>
>
>
> Additionally, as I've developed the tests I've been updating/fixing the
> patch subset server implementation so that it passes all of the tests. So
> you can currently run the full test suite against the demo incremental
> transfer server we have running at
> https://fonts.gstatic.com/experimental/patch_subset/demo.html and all the
> tests pass.
>
>
>
> *In other words, we now have a full server conformance test suite and a
> fully compliant server implementation!*
>
> Example command to run the tests:
>
> python3 test_server.py "fonts.gstatic.com"
> "/experimental/patch_subset/ofl/montserrat/Montserrat[wght].ttf" "<path to
> local copy of Montserrat[wght].ttf (from https://github.com/google/fonts
> )>"
>
>
>
> Next steps will be to develop Range Request conformance tests, which
> should be fairly simple. I believe these will mostly end up being tests for
> correctly handling of the http range request headers. Then lastly, the
> client conformance tests for both patch subset and range request.
>
>
>
>
>