- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:29:19 -0500
- To: Virginia DeBolt <virginia@vdebolt.com>
- CC: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>, public-webed@w3.org
Hi, Virginia- On 12/9/11 11:42 AM, Virginia DeBolt wrote: >>> I note that the term "(X)HTML" is used widely throughout the curriculum; we >>> may wish to change to the term "HTML", if we consider that a current best >>> practice. >> >> We are using HTML5 as the markup standard throughout the rest of the material, >> so yes, we should change it to HTML, imo, for consistency's sake. > > I would be willing to go through the Web Design I& II courses to change > (X)HTML to HTML. That would be great! In general, there are places where an author may have actually meant XHTML (e.g. referring to specific well-formedness or validity constraints), but I don't know if that occurs in any of the InterACT stuff... I leave it to your judgment. > I also want to point out that I created an introductory HTML5 module that > was never published on the http://interact.webstandards.org/ site, but it is > ready to go on the WaSP EduTF wiki. I can provide the URL if you want it. That would be fantastic! We have a lot of HTML5 reference material, but not a curriculum module. (Of course, we will want to continue to coordinate with WaSP EduTF on this stuff.) You're awesome, Virginia! Great to see you here in WebEd CG. Regards- -Doug
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 17:29:31 UTC