- From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 18:09:29 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Virginia DeBolt <virginia@vdebolt.com>, public-webed@w3.org
On 9 Dec 2011, at 17:29, Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, Virginia- > > On 12/9/11 11:42 AM, Virginia DeBolt wrote: >>>> I note that the term "(X)HTML" is used widely throughout the curriculum; we >>>> may wish to change to the term "HTML", if we consider that a current best >>>> practice. >>> >>> We are using HTML5 as the markup standard throughout the rest of the material, >>> so yes, we should change it to HTML, imo, for consistency's sake. >> >> I would be willing to go through the Web Design I& II courses to change >> (X)HTML to HTML. > > That would be great! > > In general, there are places where an author may have actually meant XHTML (e.g. referring to specific well-formedness or validity constraints), but I don't know if that occurs in any of the InterACT stuff... I leave it to your judgment. > > >> I also want to point out that I created an introductory HTML5 module that >> was never published on the http://interact.webstandards.org/ site, but it is >> ready to go on the WaSP EduTF wiki. I can provide the URL if you want it. > > That would be fantastic! We have a lot of HTML5 reference material, but not a curriculum module. (Of course, we will want to continue to coordinate with WaSP EduTF on this stuff.) > > You're awesome, Virginia! Great to see you here in WebEd CG. Indeed ;-)
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 18:10:05 UTC