Re: CSS shorthand reference

On 6 Dec 2011, at 13:32, Richard D. Worth wrote:

> Looking good. I fixed a few minor typos, added some oxford commas, made the indentation in code samples consistent, and made the headings consistent (some had 'shorthand' others did not, I opted for not).

Cheers Richard.

I've filled in the blanks now.

> 
> Wasn't sure how to fix wording on "rarely want to go this granular, for will probably use simply"

ah yes, that was a bit horrible. Fixed it ;-)

> 
> Also, can we standardize on spelling it "color" instead of "colour" as it's consistent with the property in the specs?

yes. and serial commas ;-)

I have added points about these to the style guide.

Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 16:11:31 UTC