- From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:27:38 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: "Richard D. Worth" <rdworth@gmail.com>, public-webed@w3.org
On 6 Dec 2011, at 15:03, Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, Chris- > > On 12/6/11 8:32 AM, Richard D. Worth wrote: >> Looking good. I fixed a few minor typos, added some oxford commas, > > See!? See!? You should use Oxford commas, Chris!!! > > (I recently abused Chris about this topic offlist... ^_^) Damn you all ;-) In all honestly, I'm not generally a fan of the serial comma, but I don't really care what we use, as long as it's consistent and it gets done. > >> made >> the indentation in code samples consistent, and made the headings >> consistent (some had 'shorthand' others did not, I opted for not). >> >> Wasn't sure how to fix wording on "rarely want to go this granular, for >> will probably use simply" >> >> Also, can we standardize on spelling it "color" instead of "colour" as >> it's consistent with the property in the specs? > > I agree... though localization is good, property values, and references to terms used in them, should be synced with specs. Again, because I am a whiny Brit, I prefer English spelling, but I definitely agree that having spelling as per specs will reduce confusion for beginners.
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 15:28:11 UTC