public-webcrypto@w3.org from July 2014 by author

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: importKey doesn't seem to define handling of the keyData argument in some cases (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: importKey doesn't seem to define handling of the keyData argument in some cases (Wednesday, 16 July)
• importKey doesn't seem to define handling of the keyData argument in some cases (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Sunday, 13 July)
• Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• V1.1 of MSR ECCLib for NUMS Curves library released (now supporting GCC on Linux) (Sunday, 20 July)
• How many curves should a UA support? (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: Changes required to add the NUMS curves to Web Cryptography API (Saturday, 12 July)
• Changes required to add the NUMS curves to Web Cryptography API (Friday, 11 July)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] our next call on 21st of July @ 20:UTC (with some votes inside) (Sunday, 6 July)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 26465] Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 26465] Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 26311] Algorithm names should be enforced to be ASCII and normalized to lowercase (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 26465] Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 26311] Algorithm names should be enforced to be ASCII and normalized to lowercase (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 26311] Algorithm names should be enforced to be ASCII and normalized to lowercase (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 26311] Algorithm names should be enforced to be ASCII and normalized to lowercase (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 26465] Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 26465] Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 26465] Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 26465] New: Algorithm normalization doesn't allow arbitrary operations for AlgorithmIdentifier fields (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 26458] Are all the API methods really returning Promise<any>, or can the return value be specified more precisely? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26458] Are all the API methods really returning Promise<any>, or can the return value be specified more precisely? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26458] Are all the API methods really returning Promise<any>, or can the return value be specified more precisely? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26458] Are all the API methods really returning Promise<any>, or can the return value be specified more precisely? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26458] Are all the API methods really returning Promise<any>, or can the return value be specified more precisely? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26458] New: Are all the API methods really returning Promise<any>, or can the return value be specified more precisely? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25618] Extensibility: Offer spec-blessed ways to extend the algorithms and curves, rather than monkey-patching the spec (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Sunday, 27 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Sunday, 27 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 26 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 26 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 25815] Spec encourages unsafe handling of secret data for JWK import of RSA/ECC keys (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 26411] Caller can't force JWK to be distinguished as public or private key (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 26411] Caller can't force JWK to be distinguished as public or private key (Tuesday, 22 July)
• [Bug 26413] New: Inconsistent handling of usages parameter between importKey and generateKey (Tuesday, 22 July)
• [Bug 26412] New: Asymmetric algorithms do not specify how to compute usages/extractability during importKey (Tuesday, 22 July)
• [Bug 26411] Caller can't force JWK to be distinguished as public or private key (Tuesday, 22 July)
• [Bug 26411] New: Caller can't force JWK to be distinguished as public or private key (Tuesday, 22 July)
• [Bug 26380] New: importKey doesn't define handling of keyData in some cases (Thursday, 17 July)
• [Bug 26348] Allow JWK for PBKDF2 (Wednesday, 16 July)
• [Bug 26348] New: Allow JWK for PBKDF2 (Wednesday, 16 July)
• [Bug 26331] New: Usage Intersection is defined as operating on arrays, rather than sequences (Monday, 14 July)
• [Bug 26322] New: Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense (Sunday, 13 July)
• [Bug 26080] Remove unsafe named curves from Web Crypto API (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 26320] New: RsaHashedKeyAlgorithm inherits from RsaKeyAlgorithm (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 26080] Remove unsafe named curves from Web Crypto API (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 26315] New: ECDSA/ECDH: "namedCurve ASN.1 type" is ambiguous (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 26311] New: Algorithm names should be enforced to be ASCII and normalized to lowercase (Friday, 11 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [Bug 26301] Normalization: Should through instead of returning an Error instance (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [Bug 26301] New: Normalization: Should through instead of returning an Error instance (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [Bug 26300] New: Normalization: "If alg is an IDL object" is confusing (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Tuesday, 8 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Monday, 7 July)
• [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable (Monday, 7 July)
• [Bug 25721] extractable keys should be disabled by default (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)
• [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations (Tuesday, 1 July)

GALINDO Virginie

• [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for NUMS curves, as part of the bug 25839 related to curve25519 (Saturday, 26 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for contributors on curve 25519 extension (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Saturday, 26 July)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25985 on browser interoperability (Friday, 25 July)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 26080 on removing non-NIST algo (Friday, 25 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25607 related to security recommendation (Friday, 25 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] WG call next monday @ 20:00 UTC - with bug resolutions and votes inside (Friday, 25 July)
• RE: [Cfrg] CFRG@IETF90 summary (Thursday, 24 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] WG call next monday @ 20:00 UTC - with bug resolutions and votes inside (Thursday, 24 July)
• RE: Changes required to add the NUMS curves to Web Cryptography API (Saturday, 12 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] our next call on 28th of July @ 20:UTC (with some votes inside) (Monday, 7 July)
• RE : [W3C Web Crypto WG] our next call on 21st of July @ 20:UTC (with some votes inside) (Monday, 7 July)
• [W3C Web Crypto WG] our next call on 21st of July @ 20:UTC (with some votes inside) (Friday, 4 July)

Harry Halpin

• Meeting minutes for July 28th meeting (Monday, 28 July)
• Next call August 11th: Dedicated to extension and ECC Curves (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: RE : [W3C Web Crypto WG] our next call on 21st of July @ 20:UTC (with some votes inside) (Monday, 7 July)

Mike Jones

• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] WG call next monday @ 20:00 UTC - with bug resolutions and votes inside (Friday, 25 July)

Richard Barnes

• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Web Crypto API - about named curve addition (Tuesday, 8 July)

Ryan Sleevi

• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for contributors on curve 25519 extension (Monday, 28 July)
• RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] suggested resolution for bug 25839 on curve25519 (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: importKey doesn't seem to define handling of the keyData argument in some cases (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: importKey doesn't seem to define handling of the keyData argument in some cases (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Spec for CryptoKey.algorithm and CryptoKey.usages doesn't really make sense (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: Changes required to add the NUMS curves to Web Cryptography API (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Changes required to add the NUMS curves to Web Cryptography API (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Spec for RSA-OAEP doesn't say what to do for null or missing or array buffer view labels (Wednesday, 9 July)

Wendy Seltzer

• Next WebCrypto call: Monday August 11, 20 UTC (Monday, 28 July)
• Draft minutes from [W3C Web Crypto WG] 28 July call (Monday, 28 July)
• Fwd: [Cfrg] CFRG@IETF90 summary (Thursday, 24 July)

조상래

• Workshop item to be discussed (Friday, 18 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2014 20:24:54 UTC