- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:42:31 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618 --- Comment #8 from Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> --- (In reply to Mike Jones from comment #7) > I would like us to seriously considering using registries for extensibility > of WebCrypto - either IANA registries or W3C registries, as it cleanly > solves the extensibility problem better than any of the other approaches > that have been discussed. Mike, This comment is completely unrelated to the meat at hand with this issue. The spec already supports registration of arbitrary algorithms, by virtue of the algorithms defined in Algorithm Normalization. A registry serves no direct technical purpose in support of that - it's purely documentary. However, much in the same way that the W3C does not provide a "registry" of specs that modify the IDL for the Window or Document, it would be a serious change in precedent to provide a registry for Algorithms - and, arguably, a detrimental one. The W3C process is fully capable of embracing specs on REC track, within this WG or other. However, in order to meaningfully address this issue, we don't need registries. We need to identify the places that are hardcoded with certain assumptions about algorithms being supported, and tease them out to be like algorithm normalization. Then, whether you hide it behind the documentation of a registry (unnecessarily) or you place it within the realm of REC track documents, spec authors can meaningfully avoid monkey patching. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2014 00:42:32 UTC