W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > February 2013

Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call today @ 20:00 UTC

From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:05:35 +0000
To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
CC: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F75C98B4-A913-4B32-949F-05E9A8FD0F96@netflix.com>

Apologies for today's meeting (I am on paternity leave). My colleague Scott Kelly will attend the call.

I agree with Ryan's proposals for closing issues.

Regarding prioritization of future work, I'd obviously like to propose that we prioritize items for which there are concrete proposals on the table, specifically key wrap/unwrap.


Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:02 AM, "GALINDO Virginie" <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com<mailto:Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>> wrote:

Dear all,

Here is a proposed agenda for our call today @20 UTC
Bridge and irc are the usual ones
+1.617.761.6200, 27978# (CRYPT)
IRC irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org>:6665 #crypto


---------agenda proposal for 4th of february ------

1- Welcome - 5

- attendees list

- pick a scribe  - (scribe guide https://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html  or http://www.w3.org/2008/04/scribe.html )

- agenda approval

- minutes approval from previous meeting http://www.w3.org/2013/01/21-crypto-minutes.html

2- Web Crypto API  30

W3C office discussion about IANA registry by Harry Halpin (W3C)

Schedule of JOSE work and dependency with our roadmap by Mike J (Microsoft)

Discussing proposal from editor to close issues
- PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-40 - How should we define key discovery, noting asynchronicity<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0099.html> Ryan Sleevi
- PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-37 - Method Naming<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0098.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-34 - Representation of certificates<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0097.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-33 - Clarify text in section 5.1 with respect to how key tainting is handled with multi-origin scenario<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0096.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-32 - API should mention the use of secure elements in the context of key security<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0095.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-31 - Problems with keys attribute of the Crypto interface<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0094.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-30 - How does the application know where the key is stored ?<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0093.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-29 - Handling of block encryption modes and padding<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0091.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-26 - Should key generation be allowed to specify multi-origin shared access<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0090.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-25 - How do we provision Global Unique ID for pre-provisioned symmetric keys<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0089.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-24 - Defining a Synchronous API<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0088.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-19 - Does it make sense to have authorized-origin and specific-origin keys<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0087.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-18: Should it be possible to perform CryptoOperations as a 'streaming' operation with URI semantics?<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0086.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-17 - Define the scope and API for custom key attributes<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0085.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-15: Discovering certificates associated with (private) keys<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0084.html> Ryan Sleevi
-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-10: Making sure our API is usable with pure js environement<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0083.html> Ryan Sleevi

-  PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-9<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2013Jan/0082.html>

3- High Level API  10

Discussion on the first draft https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-highlevel/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

4- secondary feature discussion  5

Define a placeholder for discussing secondary features

4- Group Life  10

Our next F2F : proposal of resolution : 24/24 April 2013 in California (in Paypal)

5- AOB  5

News from 3GPP http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012Nov/0096.html
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 19:06:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:02:00 UTC