Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
06/01/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting
Event Updated: WebAuthn F2F at RSA 2022
[w3c/webauthn] 743802: Make a normative-looking "may" actually normative ...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[webauthn] Pull Request: Mention constant-zero signature counter in §6.1.1 Signature Counter Considerations
[w3c/webauthn] f9ccf4: Mention constant-zero signature counter in §6.1.1 ...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[webauthn] Provide passwordless example, or update 1.3.2. to be a passwordless example (#1735)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide passwordless example, or update 1.3.2. to be a passwordless example (#1735)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide passwordless example, or update 1.3.2. to be a passwordless example (#1735)
[webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
- Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Add "Code injection attacks" security consideration
[w3c/webauthn] d388f9: Add security consideration: Code injection attacks
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[w3c/webauthn] df052b: Add security consideration: Code injection attacks
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[w3c/webauthn] 4442cb: Narrow claim about MitM resistance to tampering sp...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] Portability of private keys (#865)
Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663)
- Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663)
- Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663)
[w3c/webauthn] ccfd0b: Resolve comment by jovasco
[webauthn] new commits pushed by agl
[w3c/webauthn] d92bad: The DPK is stored on the authenticator.
[webauthn] new commits pushed by agl
[webauthn] Pull Request: Readd the PRF extension.
- Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732)
- Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732)
- Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732)
- Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732)
Event Canceled: WebAuthn WG - canceled after F2F
Closed: [webauthn] Unclear/underspecified signature formats (#1721)
Closed: [webauthn] Can userHandle be an empty string? (#1722)
[w3c/webauthn] 307c29: Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
[w3c/webauthn] 0678b0: Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by nsatragno
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Updates based on DOM's abort reason
Closed: [webauthn] Fix the "aborted flag" reference (#1682)
05/18/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
[webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validation when invoking the API from 3rd party origin (#1731)
- Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731)
- Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731)
- Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731)
- Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731)
- Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
[webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730)
- Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730)
- Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730)
- Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730)
- Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730)
- Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730)
Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695)
- Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695)
- Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695)
Re: [webauthn] Unclear/underspecified signature formats (#1721)
Re: [webauthn] Can userHandle be an empty string? (#1722)
Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718)
- Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718)
- Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718)
Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577)
- Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577)
- Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577)
[w3c/webauthn] 939e8d: Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
Re: [webauthn] Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724)
[w3c/webauthn] d30a94: Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by nsatragno
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make Jeff Hodges a former editor.
[webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)
- Closed: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728)