- From: Mark Fulton via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 20:00:44 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Ouch, yes. I mean, it might deter someone less tech savvy so at least it'd block more folks but that's a good point. On Wed, May 4, 2022, 2:10 PM Shane Weeden ***@***.***> wrote: > if accessing the information had required scanning the user's fingerprint > and didn't accept simply the PIN (which the family member had discovered > somehow, probably through observation) then the information would have > remained protected > > With the PIN, couldn't that family member add their own fingerprint and > then use it anyway? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1728#issuecomment-1117715811>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKUPXKOXHHF6BN7WFAVHKTVILDTNANCNFSM5VB25ZAA> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > -- GitHub Notification of comment by mfulton26 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1728#issuecomment-1117830200 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2022 20:00:46 UTC