- From: Firstyear via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 23:41:58 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
IMO we shouldn't include random extensions like this to the standard. Currently between the 5 models of test authenticator I have from various vendors, no webauthn extension is supported by them. I think these extensions should be left to specific device manufacturers to define and publish, so that at the least, RP's know *which* manufacturers might support them, rather than misleading that "every" webauthn device "might" support this. Alternately, there should be a declaration of which vendor's devices support that extension so that it can be tested and checked by RP's when they go to implement the standard. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Firstyear Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1732#issuecomment-1130749618 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2022 23:41:59 UTC