public-webauthn@w3.org from November 2020 by author

=JeffH

• [w3c/webauthn] 944d12: ensure basic attestation type allows for self-sign... (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 489722: Fix a link to userVerification parameter (Monday, 9 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0061ec: Incorp emlun's suggestion,thx! (Monday, 9 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 9b1505: add parenthetical to jcjones' suggested text (Sunday, 8 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 518713: also incorp jcjones' other suggestion ;-) (Sunday, 8 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] c28976: incorp jcjones' suggestion, thx! (Sunday, 8 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] b15254: update IANA considerations per IANA instructions (... (Friday, 6 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 13349b: update step 21 of RP reg ops (Friday, 6 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b8113: spelling correction, thx akshayku :) (Friday, 6 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 971bdd: fix links to defined extensions section (Thursday, 5 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 489722: Fix a link to userVerification parameter (Thursday, 5 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] e8ae1a: IANA registration for 'none' attestation statement... (Thursday, 5 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] eae38f: editorial (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 5d907a: WIP (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 263aea: IANA registration for 'none' attestation statement... (Wednesday, 4 November)

=JeffH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] double check whether the Secure Payment Confirmation effort has implications on the WebAuthn spec (#1492) (Wednesday, 25 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix out-of-sync step number (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] Algorithm step numbers out of sync (#1523) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update bikeshed files for Process 2020 (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] migrate the WebAuthn L2 spec to the W3C 2020 Process Document? (#1515) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] migrate the WebAuthn L2 spec to the W3C 2020 Process Document? (#1515) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: ensure basic attestation type allows for self-signed attestation certs (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] ensure basic attestation type allows for self-signed attestation certs (#1498) (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Monday, 9 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Monday, 9 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Address review comment by @bdewater (Monday, 9 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webauthn] ensure basic attestation type allows for self-signed attestation certs (#1509) (Sunday, 8 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Sunday, 8 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Sunday, 8 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Sunday, 8 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: update IANA considerations per IANA instructions (Friday, 6 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 6 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] Update IANA Considerations section (#1495) (Friday, 6 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 6 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 6 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [webauthn] update IANA considerations per IANA instructions (#1512) (Thursday, 5 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Thursday, 5 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Thursday, 5 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: IANA registration for 'none' attestation statement format identifier (Thursday, 5 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] is None attestation format registered with IANA? Do so if not. (#1493) (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [webauthn] update IANA considerations per IANA instructions (#1512) (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: update IANA considerations per IANA instructions (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Display OIDs consistently (#1508) (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: IANA registration for 'none' attestation statement format identifier (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 4 November)

Adam Langley via GitHub

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Tweaks to string handling section (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] String Handling section nits (#1527) (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Support for language/direction metadata in PKCE 'name'? (#1526) (Monday, 30 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Update names in examples. (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider adding/using personal name examples that are more culturally neutral/diverse [editorial] (#1525) (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Friday, 20 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] KeyUsage requirement (Certificate Signing or empty) for attestation roots (#1519) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [webauthn] KeyUsage requirement (Certificate Signing or empty) for attestation roots (#1519) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] user-agent signal for enterprise attestation should be understandable for general users (#1521) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [webauthn] user-agent signal for enterprise attestation should be understandable for general users (#1521) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Location extension returns the authenticator coordinates to RP without user consent (#1517) (Wednesday, 18 November)

Addison Phillips via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Consider adding/using personal name examples that are more culturally neutral/diverse [editorial] (#1525) (Monday, 30 November)
• [webauthn] String Handling section nits (#1527) (Saturday, 21 November)
• [webauthn] Support for language/direction metadata in PKCE 'name'? (#1526) (Saturday, 21 November)
• [webauthn] Consider adding/using personal name examples that are more culturally neutral/diverse [editorial] (#1525) (Saturday, 21 November)

ANTHONY NADALIN

• 11/18/220 W3C Web Authentication WG Meetings (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 2864b7: Update for L2-WD04 publication (Monday, 16 November)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Location extension returns the authenticator coordinates to RP without user consent (#1517) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update for L2-WD04 publication (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nadalin (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Update for L2-WD04 publication (#1520) (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Support for PWA authenticators (#1514) (Wednesday, 11 November)

Arshad Noor

• Re: [webauthn] user-agent signal for enterprise attestation should be understandable for general users (#1521) (Tuesday, 17 November)

Arshad Noor via GitHub

• [webauthn] Making PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.transports mandatory (#1522) (Tuesday, 17 November)

Bart de Water via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Display OIDs consistently (#1508) (Tuesday, 3 November)

Billy Jack via GitHub

• [webauthn] KeyUsage requirement (Certificate Signing or empty) for attestation roots (#1519) (Monday, 16 November)

Boris Zbarsky via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Thursday, 19 November)

David Waite via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing cross-domain credential use (#1372) (Thursday, 26 November)

Emil Lundberg

• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 19 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 68aa63: Fix out-of-sync step number (#1524) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] f59109: Fix out-of-sync step number (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Monday, 9 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] da3640: Address review comment by @bdewater (#1513) (Monday, 9 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 33c959: Address review comment by @bdewater (Monday, 9 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7f8fe0: Display OIDs consistently (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 2ad9e5: Add OID string as suggested by @equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 489722: Fix a link to userVerification parameter (Wednesday, 4 November)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing cross-domain credential use (#1372) (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider adding/using personal name examples that are more culturally neutral/diverse [editorial] (#1525) (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing cross-domain credential use (#1372) (Thursday, 26 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix out-of-sync step number (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] Algorithm step numbers out of sync (#1523) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 9 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Address review comment by @bdewater (Monday, 9 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Display OIDs consistently (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] Inconsistent display formats for OIDs (#1504) (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix a link to userVerification parameter (Wednesday, 4 November)

Firstyear via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 2 November)
• [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 2 November)

J.C. Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Monday, 30 November)

Jeff Hodges

• wrt Cached UV usage (Friday, 6 November)

John Bradley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Support for language/direction metadata in PKCE 'name'? (#1526) (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Location extension returns the authenticator coordinates to RP without user consent (#1517) (Sunday, 15 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Support for PWA authenticators (#1514) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Tuesday, 10 November)

John Fontana via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Update for L2-WD04 publication (#1520) (Monday, 16 November)

Jonathan Grossar via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Making PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.transports mandatory (#1522) (Friday, 20 November)

Julien Cayzac via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Support for PWA authenticators (#1514) (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] Support for PWA authenticators (#1514) (Wednesday, 11 November)

Ken Buchanan via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Tuesday, 17 November)

Maciej Stachowiak via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Friday, 20 November)

mpeng-okta via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing cross-domain credential use (#1372) (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider allowing cross-domain credential use (#1372) (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: [webauthn] add additional attestation format(s) from Apple (#1453) (Thursday, 5 November)

nadalin@prodigy.net

• 11/25/220 W3C Web Authentication WG Meetings - CANCELLED (Wednesday, 25 November)
• 11/11/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 11 November)
• 11/04/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 4 November)

Nick Steele via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Wednesday, 18 November)

Nina Satragno via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Closed: [webauthn] Length restriction on user handles has no processing model associated with it (#1302) (Wednesday, 18 November)

Pegah Ahmadvand via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) (Sunday, 1 November)

Pranjal Jumde via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Thursday, 19 November)
• [webauthn] user-agent signal for enterprise attestation should be understandable for general users (#1521) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: [webauthn] Location extension returns the authenticator coordinates to RP without user consent (#1517) (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] largeBlob storage extension can be used to bypass 3p storage restrictions (#1518) (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] Location extension returns the authenticator coordinates to RP without user consent (#1517) (Sunday, 15 November)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 2 November)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 3 November)

WebAuthnBot

• [w3c/webauthn] 7c83d4: Built by Travis-CI: 68aa633fbf5f80704e2684f44068b0... (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 48b420: Built by Travis-CI: 68aa633fbf5f80704e2684f44068b0... (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 99adf7: Built by Travis-CI: 7f347082f24d3672c4a498eded14f6... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 199aef: Built by Travis-CI: 7f347082f24d3672c4a498eded14f6... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 8c7be5: Built by Travis-CI: 423add515d5a49bccda4ac8b2e12c8... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 696801: Built by Travis-CI: b0319cf6907f5d0abc79a833d4898b... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] a1c31e: Built by Travis-CI: b0319cf6907f5d0abc79a833d4898b... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 51466f: Built by Travis-CI: 30c354e0b57b4c387b4d7254ecfee5... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] bc7075: Built by Travis-CI: 30c354e0b57b4c387b4d7254ecfee5... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] bf9550: Built by Travis-CI: a858cb388d60d8196a29593c7d90c4... (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 063ef1: Built by Travis-CI: 7a0de90f76dafb8fc17580c136be3a... (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 23121e: Built by Travis-CI: 944d126038ba4b46efa29bf7e6a724... (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 06f87f: Built by Travis-CI: da36403d29fe6a9aa2a6d649a22cdd... (Monday, 9 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] e1a19d: Built by Travis-CI: b1525478f8daa2dd581616079f8fc9... (Friday, 6 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 528abe: Built by Travis-CI: e8ae1a38807c17260a8f3b6ece6e08... (Thursday, 5 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 389735: Built by Travis-CI: 87d0d7c0987fcd4bd8614b204589e0... (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 2b35b1: Built by Travis-CI: 2109f8e297626e0d116cbb81015c5e... (Wednesday, 4 November)

WebAuthnBot via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 9 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 6 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Thursday, 5 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 4 November)

Wendy Seltzer

• [w3c/webauthn] 7f3470: Having created the WD, change this back to ED (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 423add: Fix all the Patent Policy links to 2017 (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] b0319c: HTTPS the PP refs (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 30c354: Update status-WD.include (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 2864b7: Update for L2-WD04 publication (Monday, 16 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7a0de9: Update bikeshed for Process 2020 (#1516) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] 334726: Update bikeshed for Process 2020 (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 11 November)

Wendy Seltzer via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Update for L2-WD04 publication (Monday, 16 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [webauthn] migrate the WebAuthn L2 spec to the W3C 2020 Process Document? (#1515) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Update bikeshed files for Process 2020 (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by wseltzer (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [webauthn] migrate the WebAuthn L2 spec to the W3C 2020 Process Document? (#1515) (Wednesday, 11 November)

Last message date: Monday, 30 November 2020 23:35:22 UTC