- From: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:00:05 -0400
- To: <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004401cf4b89$7ab7eab0$7027c010$@net>
Hi all, http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#specification-history In the very beginning of the history part, we read "The XMLHttpRequest <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest> object was initially defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort. (Long after Microsoft shipped an implementation.) " To me this is ambiguous: It could either mean 1. Long after Microsoft had shipped a related implementation, the XMLHttpRequest <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest> object was defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort or 2. The XMLHttpRequest <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest> object was initially defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort. (Much later, Microsoft shipped an implementation.) I suspect that 2, rather than 1 is meant, but given that Microsoft's ActiveX extensions allowed something functionally similar, the earlier interpretation might be found by readers. It's not clear why Microsoft should be mentioned at all, if in fact, their implementation was much later. Do we always mention companies who are the last to implement things in spec histories? At any rate, to avoid the confusion, (and if it is, in some way, important to the historical narrative to point out that Microsoft was the last to implement this particular thing) I would recommend the rewrite suggested by #2. Cheers David
Received on Saturday, 29 March 2014 20:22:58 UTC