- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:56:03 +0000 (UTC)
- To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, David Dailey wrote: > > "The XMLHttpRequest > <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest> object was > initially defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort. (Long after > Microsoft shipped an implementation.) " > > To me this is ambiguous: > > It could either mean > > 1. Long after Microsoft had shipped a related implementation, the > XMLHttpRequest <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest> > object was defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort This is correct. > 2. The XMLHttpRequest > <http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest> object was initially > defined as part of the WHATWG's HTML effort. (Much later, Microsoft shipped > an implementation.) If this was the meaning, you would need a comma after "Long after". -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 29 March 2014 23:56:29 UTC