Re: [push] Consider renaming "push notification" to "push message" in the Push API spec

Sure, we will look out for additional potentially confusing term overlap as suggested.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan

On Mar 11, 2014, at 12:38 PM, "Michael van Ouwerkerk" <mvanouwerkerk@google.com<mailto:mvanouwerkerk@google.com>> wrote:

I think that's a great suggestion Jeffrey.

Specifically, I would like to avoid confusing concepts and terminology in the Push API with those in Web Notifications: http://www.w3.org/TR/notifications/

This is important because these two APIs are often discussed together: an app might display a notification to the user after receiving a push message from the server.

Regards,

Michael



On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com<mailto:jyasskin@google.com>> wrote:
The term "push notification" in
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/tip/index.html#dfn-push-notification
seems to confuse people into thinking that the user will be
notified/bothered when such a message arrives. This is reinforced by
the fact that iOS uses "push notification" for exactly that: a way to
notify the user based on a message from a server. See
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/NetworkingInternet/Conceptual/RemoteNotificationsPG/Chapters/WhatAreRemoteNotif.html.

Since the spec already uses the name "PushMessage" for the thing
delivered by a push notification
(https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/tip/index.html#pushmessage-interface),
it seems like "push message" would be a good replacement for the
current ambiguous name.

Thanks,
Jeffrey Yasskin

P.S. I'm not subscribed to public-webapps@, so please cc me if you
want me to reply.

Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 08:59:46 UTC