Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note? from Charles McCathie Nevile on 2014-02-27 (public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:22:13 +0100
To: "Rafael Weinstein" <rafaelw@google.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xbwzbbimy3oazb@chaals.local>

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:47:19 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:

> On 2/26/14 3:44 PM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote:
>> It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was  
>> "merged" to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML,  
>> which might raise the question "did HTML do something different than  
>> what this spec used to say?").
>
> Yes, I agree "merged" is a key operative word we would want to  
> communicate in the Note.

Agreed - and yes, this would be a good thing to do in general.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 00:22:50 UTC