- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:29:18 -0800
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADh5Ky3BBZzqSt6SpatzSAFD0qJZ_OJmNA-6d7ny-Xm5RP0mPA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > On 2/6/14 9:06 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > >> Could chairs of the working group please clarify whether we have had a >> reach of consensus on the default encapsulation level in shadow DOM? >> > > As described in [WorkMode], WebApps' asynchronous participation and edit > first "work modes" means group members must actively participate on the > list and actively file bugs and participate in bug reports. We also expect > both Editors and group participants to work toward obtaining broad > consensus as described in the charter [Decisions]. > > > > More concretely, have we _decided_ that we only want Type 1 encapsulation >> for the level 1 specifications of Web components instead of Type 2 or Type >> 1 and Type 2 encapsulations as defined in Maciej's email sent out in June >> 29th, 2011: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1364.html >> >> I don't recall any consensus being reached about this matter. >> >> In fact, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ >> 2012OctDec/thread.html#msg312 >> (referred by http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0221. >> html) >> clearly shows the lack of consensus in my eyes as both Boris Zbarsky from >> Mozilla and Maciej Stachowiak from Apple have voiced to prefer Type 2 >> encapsulation: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0406.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0421.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0628.html >> >> while representatives of Google preferring Type 1 encapsulations. >> > > I agree the threads started by Maciej at [1364.html] and Dimitri at > [0312.html] do not appear to have reached broad consensus. (I am not > subscribed to www-style so I haven't followed those discussions.) > FWIW, the story is not complete without http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/thread.html#msg800, which indicates a higher degree of consensus. Right? > Dimitri, Maciej, Ryosuke - is there a mutually agreeable solution here? > I am exactly sure what problem this thread hopes to raise and whether there is a need for anything other than what is already planned. The plan is, per thread I mentioned above, is to add a flag to createShadowRoot that hides it from DOM traversal APIs and relevant CSS selectors: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20144. :DG<
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 23:29:46 UTC