- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:59:51 -0400
- To: "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
This is a call for review for the WebSocket API test files from Opera: <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/> Note: some of these files were included in an earlier RfR [1]. Below, James identifies those files that were in [1] but have since changed. Note: the *-1.html files in the unload-a-document directory are "helper" files (that are not directly run). If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org by March 25. If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone reviewed the tests). In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved by the WG. -Thanks, AB [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-testsuite/2013Feb/0025.html> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: RfR: 32 WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 7 Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:37:39 +0000 Resent-From: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:37:06 +0100 From: ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> To: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> On 03/11/2013 02:17 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > James, Simon - presumably the test files for the RfR that ended March 7 > are now reviewed and considered approved unless any of them were changed > during the RfR period. If any of those files were changed during the > review, please let us which ones. if my hg-fu worked the files that changed from the set in the previous RfR are: WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/002.html WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/004.html WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/008.html WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/opening-handshake/002.html > Also, would you please clarify the set of additional files that need > review? It appears to me the files _not_ yet reviewed are: > > * 2 files in ><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/ > - just 013.html and 014.html > > * 7 files in ><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/cookies/ > > * 72 files in the subdirs of ><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/interfaces/> > > > * 5 - 8 files in ><http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/unload-a-document/> > - should all of these files be reviewed (the use of "dash-1" in the > filenames is `different` so just want to make sure). The -1 files are "helper" files i.e. they are part of the test but not the main url that gets loaded. > After the set of files that need are clarified, I'll start a new RfR. Your list sounds right. In essence everything under WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/ is ready for review.
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 20:00:18 UTC