W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > March 2013

Call for Test Results: CR-websockets-20120920

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:01:15 -0400
Message-ID: <51559EAB.8000900@nokia.com>
To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Ken Reed <kenre@microsoft.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Hi Kris, Ken, Simon, James, All,

Since the RfR for Opera's WebSocket tests passed, I copied the reviewed 
files to [approved]. I presume the totality of the approved tests is 
sufficient to test the Web Socket CR's exit criteria [CR-EC], thus I 
would like us to start interop testing.

Kris/Ken - would you please lead this interop effort e.g. consolidating 

James/Simon - can you help gather data (f.ex. run some subset of the 
tests, run the tests on a subset of the browsers, etc.)?

I would like to understand where we have good interop as well as where 
we have issues, with the longer-term goal of knowing if we have 
sufficient interop to move the CR to Proposed Recommendation per the 
CR's exit criteria [CREC].

For some example interop reports, see 
<http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents> and 

-Thanks, AB

[approved] <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/approved/>
[CREC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-websockets-20120920/#crec>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	RfR: WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 25
Resent-Date: 	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:00:18 +0000
Resent-From: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Date: 	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:59:51 -0400
From: 	ext Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
To: 	public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>

This is a call for review for the WebSocket API test files from Opera:


Note: some of these files were included in an earlier RfR [1]. Below,
James identifies those files that were in [1] but have since changed.

Note: the *-1.html files in the unload-a-document directory are "helper"
files (that are not directly run).

If you have any comments, please send them to
public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org by March 25.

If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that
as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone
reviewed the tests).

In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved
by the WG.

-Thanks, AB


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: RfR: 32 WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 7
Resent-Date: 	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:37:39 +0000
Resent-From: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Date: 	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:37:06 +0100
From: 	ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
To: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>

On 03/11/2013 02:17 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> James, Simon - presumably the test files for the RfR that ended March 7
> are now reviewed and considered approved unless any of them were changed
> during the RfR period. If any of those files were changed during the
> review, please let us which ones.

if my hg-fu worked the files that changed from the set in the previous
RfR are:


> Also, would you please clarify the set of additional files that need
> review? It appears to me the files _not_ yet reviewed are:
> * 2 files in
>  - just 013.html and 014.html
> * 7 files in
> * 72 files in the subdirs of
> * 5 - 8 files in
> - should all of these files be reviewed (the use of "dash-1" in the
> filenames is `different` so just want to make sure).

The -1 files are "helper" files i.e. they are part of the test but not
the main url that gets loaded.

> After the set of files that need are clarified, I'll start a new RfR.

Your list sounds right. In essence everything under
WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/ is ready for review.
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 14:02:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:52:57 UTC