W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:03:50 +0100
Message-ID: <54CA1396.4040403@wwelves.org>
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
CC: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 01/28/2015 03:44 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
> Thanks! This would also provide a systematic basis for elements to add to schema.org by analyzing the popularity of conceptual elements from extensions.
+1
let's work on providing a clear pattern for creating *external*
extensions of schema.org https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/284

> Martin
> 
> On 28 Jan 2015, at 15:21, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:50 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
>> 2. A proper extension mechanism for both types and properties, and guidance on how and when to use the mechanism. This is why I tried hard to define the additionalType property proposal as a generic mechanism.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> A better extension mechanism would help us experiment before committing to a solution for some of the thornier modeling issues. 
>>
>> - Vicki
>>
>> Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com 
>>  
> 
> 



Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 11:04:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 January 2015 11:04:16 UTC