Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org from martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org on 2015-01-28 (public-vocabs@w3.org from January 2015)

From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:44:51 +0100
To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B57E3C0B-901D-4812-BC3F-234855BFB1FB@ebusiness-unibw.org>

Thanks! This would also provide a systematic basis for elements to add to schema.org by analyzing the popularity of conceptual elements from extensions. 
Martin

On 28 Jan 2015, at 15:21, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:50 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> 2. A proper extension mechanism for both types and properties, and guidance on how and when to use the mechanism. This is why I tried hard to define the additionalType property proposal as a generic mechanism.
> 
> +1
> 
> A better extension mechanism would help us experiment before committing to a solution for some of the thornier modeling issues. 
> 
> - Vicki
> 
> Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com 
>

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 14:45:56 UTC