Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org from Dan Brickley on 2015-01-28 (public-vocabs@w3.org from January 2015)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:27:08 +0000
To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Cc: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=75GeD+8y8ukBi0a2VU_Yq7pNPSXsqQO+918ibi7T1Ayg@mail.gmail.com>

On 28 January 2015 at 14:21, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:50 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
>>
>> 2. A proper extension mechanism for both types and properties, and
>> guidance on how and when to use the mechanism. This is why I tried hard to
>> define the additionalType property proposal as a generic mechanism.
>
> +1
>
> A better extension mechanism would help us experiment before committing to a
> solution for some of the thornier modeling issues.

Slight tangent but I tried to list out the various different things we
have that serve as 'extension mechanisms' in
https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/284 - maybe 5 of 6
components. Agree that a clearer story there would benefit everyone.

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 14:27:36 UTC