W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Someone please look at my site

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:15:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CADK2AU3gpcSUNhUbyaJkZ7-U3-ZBzxy21yA5zeHeBU1pW-FMqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
To all:

In case you run into somebody who needs help with topics that are beyond
the basics handled over at Google's Product forums, please feel free to
send him/her/them through to Aaron Bradley's Google+ Semantic Search
Marketing: https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/103048251221048356778

There's a growing number of folks over there (like myself) who help each
other out for free (or at least most of the time), thus helping all to
learn by publicly sharing knowledge.

I apologize if plugging this community on the list is not done, but I just
felt I had to do it. If you agree - awesome - please spread the word. If
you don't agree, I understand, and please trust me when I say I won't make
a habit of doing this.

2015-01-17 0:45 GMT+01:00 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>:

>  On 1/16/15 2:58 PM, The Bicycling Guitarist wrote:
> I have been trying for more than a year to implement structured data
> throughout my site. I have posted in the Google forum about this but
> haven’t gotten any responses to any of my most recent questions.
> On www.TheBicyclingGuitarist.net/songs/redbaron.htm  I have two videos
> each marked up as workExample of the same song but do not know if that is
> correct.
> The most important page of my site is the home page of course at
> www.TheBicyclingGuitarist.net/  Again I am not sure if I have marked up
> as much as I should the way I should. I also found that the Google
> structured data testing tool reports an error when I use genre as a
> property of MusicGroup even though the schema.org page says it is okay
> and the Stuctured Data Linter reads it without reporting it as an error.
> I also found that the example given on the schema.org breadcrumb page
> generates an html error in the w3c unicorn validator. I found an easy fix
> that works in Unicorn and still gives the structured data in the Google
> SDTT. See any of my pages’ breadcrumb navigation for an example (I moved
> the separator character inside the li). Again, not sure if this is okay,
> but the bottom line is that the code as supplied does not validate
> according to w3c, and my fix does and still gives the structured data.
> Some WW2 veterans shared stories I published for them including one at
> www.TheBicyclingGuitarist.net/china-burma-india/newman.htm. Some of my
> Studies pages have a lot of markup too such as
> www.TheBicyclingGuitarist.net/ishi/ and
> www.TheBicyclingGuitarist.net/studies/colorphotos.htm
> Basically every page of my site is as marked up as I can figure how to do,
> but I do want to know if I am doing this correctly and in the proper spirit
> of the intention of schema.org. Am I marking up too much maybe when I add
> meta tags for encodingFormat and contentSize to AudioObject mp3 files on my
> song pages? Any suggestions on how to improve what I am doing will be
> greatly appreciated. thanks
> Good start!
> I encourage you to incorporate some of the high-level HTML5+Microdata
> extensions for Chrome into your curation effort. Net effect, you can see a
> translation of your entity relationship represented in your microdata
> alongside your actual HTML document [1][2][3].
> Back to your fundamental question i.e., is this all correct? From my
> vantage point, its correct syntactically (I think), but in regards to the
> meaning of what you are trying to express (i.e., nature of the entity
> relationship types as represented) its not so easy to say "right" or
> "wrong" .
> Links:
> [1] http://susepaste.org/82867404 -- screenshot of your content
> [2] https://github.com/yoichiro/semantic_inspector
> [3] https://github.com/cwa-lml/microdata.reveal .
> --
> Regards,
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
> Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2015 10:15:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:38 UTC