W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2014

Re: tracking issues about Actions?

From: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:56:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMtUnc5_hz--9R0-6HNLo+LGMDASpHxFXW0YdMoDuUwbUijy9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

> Howdy!
> I start working again on projects where I would like to use Action
> subtree. Maybe also try to experiment with them integrated with Hydra API
> http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/schema.org/

Neat. May I ask what the use case is?

You might want to take a look at a few demos/prototypes I've been building
with examples, which should give you a concrete idea of where things are


> I wonder if we should try to bounce Actions specific feedback back and
> forth over this mailing list or use some issue tracker to keep track on
> every issue separately?

Lets use this mailing list for the moment, until it gets too verbose/noisy.

> Some of them I already have mentioned but possibly my email have drowned
> in archives of this list ;)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Nov/0200.html
> Once I get back on playing with Actions I expect gathering more feedback
> and would like to pipe it into some workflow where we can track it and
> resolve in some reasonable time. If I could choose way for tracking issues,
> as for today I would go with github issue tracker :)
> Other suggestions?

The default public-vocabs process for filling bugs is fine for the moment.
You can reach out to me personally too at goto@google.com, in case you feel
more comfortable talking to a smaller audience too :)

> Cheers!
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 16:57:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:21 UTC