- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:46:30 -0600
- To: David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaN1Lu21bSeUitObk4vpDcn=S7nqyxDSa17v6Ef0VJ0fRA@mail.gmail.com>
David, We already have your needs fulfilled with the property "sameAs" on http://schema.org/LocalBusiness or even just http://schema.org/Organization ... just use that and it works today. This proposal for "Account" is for representing Account identities sometimes represented as a url and not "__Pages__ that are created for AccountHolders or that represent them topically on a page" as I understand it. -- -Thad +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net > wrote: > I've been listening to the conversation and have been debating with > something myself. I'd like to see a way in which business listings and > business profile pages could also be distinguished through Schemas. > Particularly, I'm referring to a business' listing on sites such as Yelp, > Angie's List, YP.com, Foursquare, Infogroup, Acxiom, Factual, Nokia, > CitySearch, and even listings such as Google+ Local, Bing Places, and Yahoo > Local. Whereas a Google+ Local or Business/Brand page could be considered > a social account, I don't believe that the others could. > > So I'm not sure if SocialAccount would fit those applications, and I'm > also not sure if Account would be too general or vague. Maybe > BusinessListing, BusinessPage, ProfilePage, or even Page would be a better > suited type for those pages, I don't know. So I'm just throwing that out > there to get everyone's thoughts. Thanks. > > David > > >
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 16:47:01 UTC