W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:46:30 -0600
Message-ID: <CAChbWaN1Lu21bSeUitObk4vpDcn=S7nqyxDSa17v6Ef0VJ0fRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>

We already have your needs fulfilled with the property "sameAs" on
http://schema.org/LocalBusiness or even just
http://schema.org/Organization ... just use that and it works today.
This proposal for "Account" is for
representing Account identities sometimes represented as a url and not
"__Pages__ that are created for AccountHolders or that represent them
topically on a page" as I understand it.

+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net
> wrote:

>  I've been listening to the conversation and have been debating with
> something myself.  I'd like to see a way in which business listings and
> business profile pages could also be distinguished through Schemas.
> Particularly, I'm referring to a business' listing on sites such as Yelp,
> Angie's List, YP.com, Foursquare, Infogroup, Acxiom, Factual, Nokia,
> CitySearch, and even listings such as Google+ Local, Bing Places, and Yahoo
> Local.  Whereas a Google+ Local or Business/Brand page could be considered
> a social account, I don't believe that the others could.
> So I'm not sure if SocialAccount would fit those applications, and I'm
> also not sure if Account would be too general or vague.  Maybe
> BusinessListing, BusinessPage, ProfilePage, or even Page would be a better
> suited type for those pages, I don't know.  So I'm just throwing that out
> there to get everyone's thoughts.  Thanks.
> David
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 16:47:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:21 UTC