- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:58:30 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CADjV5jc67CiqzSk7HHVR4fM6H8Y6KAo2HZu_PVgg-M02Mn--AQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > On 23 January 2014 20:52, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nice to see things progressing! > > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> Many thanks to Vicki for working through all the fine-grained detail > >> for finalizing the Reservation vocabulary, which was circulated here a > >> while back. This version reflects all feedback, and in particular > >> pulls several pieces of ticketing-related information into a dedicated > >> Ticket type. > >> > >> Here's the RDFS: > >> > >> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/6910d4e4591a/schema.org/ext/Reservation.html > > > > > > I just noticed that the RDFS uses <http://schema.org/domain> and > > <http://schema.org/range> instead of the existing > > <http://schema.org/domainIncludes> and <http://schema.org/rangeIncludes>. > I > > suspect that's a mistake? > > It's more of an implementation glitch / TODO. The code that currently > generates the site needs tweaking to use the newer property name. > It'll get fixed; hopefully not too confusing in the meantime. > Ah, I kind of half-suspected that, since pages had been successfully generated. :) Nothing that'll mess with any data pipelines on my end, but it's good to know that it's on the TODO. (Note that these terms are used in the schemaorg_to_jsonldcontext.py script [1]. I also have similar stuff churning various schemas around, mostly for aligning vocabularies in my library work).) Cheers, Niklas [1]: https://gist.github.com/niklasl/7873635 > > Dan >
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 22:59:28 UTC