Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization

Hi Matthias,

+1 to the SocialAccount Type.  (social networks are a broad domain, and I
think will be best covered by a type for SocialAccount, rather than only a
property)

I also think at a minimum the type should have a single property called
"owner" that expects the person or organization or a thing ( Thing could be
that ground hog that folks watch his tweet for how long winter will last :-)

Additional thoughts are that folks might want to deal with extending
ownership as a date mediated property showing the start and end of
ownership in RDFa or microdata, as they see fit, for instance)

-- 
-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Matthias Tylkowski <matthias@binarypark.org
> wrote:

>  Hello Thad, Bernd and all,
> we have proposed two options on this matter at the w3c wiki
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals#Brainstorming.2C_Use_Cases_and_Advance_Notice
>
> One option supposes the introduction of a new type "SocialAccount" and a
> new property "socialAccount", the other option introduces only a property
> "socialAccount" expecting a url as value.
>
> Regards Matthias Tylkowski
>
> --
> Technischer Leiter
> Binarypark UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> Erich-Weinert-Str. 1
> 03046 Cottbus
> Tel +49 (0)355 692931
> Fax +49 (0)355 694171info@binarypark.orghttp://binarypark.org
>
>