W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Socialnetworks of a person or organization

From: Matthias Tylkowski <matthias@binarypark.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:00:06 +0100
Message-ID: <52DFCEE6.3040800@binarypark.org>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Hello Thad, Bernd and all,
we have proposed two options on this matter at the w3c wiki 
https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals#Brainstorming.2C_Use_Cases_and_Advance_Notice

One option supposes the introduction of a new type "SocialAccount" and a 
new property "socialAccount", the other option introduces only a 
property "socialAccount" expecting a url as value.

Regards Matthias Tylkowski

-- 
Technischer Leiter
Binarypark UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Erich-Weinert-Str. 1
03046 Cottbus
Tel +49 (0)355 692931
Fax +49 (0)355 694171
info@binarypark.org
http://binarypark.org   


Am 14.06.2013 18:11, schrieb Thad Guidry:
> Use an external enumeration FOR NOW.  Details here: 
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ExternalEnumerations
>
> Q: Why don't you support other vocabularies such as FOAF, SKOS, etc?
>
> In creating schema.org <http://schema.org>, one of our goals was to 
> create a single place where webmasters could go to figure out how to 
> mark up their content, with reasonable syntax and style consistency 
> across types. This way, webmasters only need to learn one thing rather 
> than having to understand different, often overlapping vocabularies. A 
> lot of the vocabulary on schema.org <http://schema.org> was inspired 
> by earlier work like Microformats, FOAF, OpenCyc, etc. Many terms in 
> schema.org <http://schema.org> came through collaborations, and we 
> acknowledge these on the schema.org <http://schema.org> site rather 
> than by making our markup more complex. See also our external 
> enumerations 
> <http://blog.schema.org/2012/05/schemaorg-markup-for-external-lists.html> mechanism 
> for handling enumerated lists of entities.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Bernd K. <fluke0870@yahoo.de 
> <mailto:fluke0870@yahoo.de>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>     what do you think is the best properties to declare social
>     networks like facebook, google+, twitter..accout for a person or
>     organization?
>     I thing memberOf is not the best.
>     How do you link a person or organization to his social website?
>     Best regards
>     Bernd
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> -Thad
> http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 14:00:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:21 UTC