- From: Paul Watson <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:18:27 +0000
- To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi all, I'd really like to push for the VisualArtwork Schema proposal, which I proposed in May last year, to be formally adopted as soon as possible in 2014. The wiki version is at http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/VisualArtwork, which contains an additional suggestion from another contributor to this list for a colorPalette property (which is a new Schema type, but I don't think the contributor ever added a draft for the colorPalette type on the wiki yet). Since the colorPalette type hasn't been drafted up by the person who suggested it, I would be quite happy to go ahead without it. In the discussions on this list there didn't seem to be any enthusiasm for it (apart from the person who proposed it). The draft RDFS/RDFa schema file at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/default/schema.org/ext/visualartwork.html is a little out-of-date: * I have renamed the "materials" property as "material" in the wiki, in line with Schema.org naming conventions * I have renamed the "edition" property as "artEdition" in the wiki, for disambiguation with any other use of the word "edition" * I have updated the descriptions of the properties in line with suggestions on this list in July/August 2013 I'm not familiar with either RDFS or Mercurial, so am hesitant to try to edit the RDFS/RDFa schema file myself - it would be great if someone more experienced with the technologies could do so. Regards, Paul --
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2014 14:18:52 UTC