- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:42:08 +0100
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 7 April 2014 06:38, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > There was a proposal for periodicals [1] that got a brief discussion on this > list [2] but then disappeared. Does anyone know where this is in the overall > scheme (or schema) of things? I put up that test site a few weeks back, and revisited it ... yesterday. I've made a new test version of the site using the new schema.org codebase that we switched to last week. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Apr/0051.html -> http://sdo-culture-bundle.appspot.com/Periodical (I didn't add the examples yet). wiki: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works schema: https://github.com/dbs/schemabibex/blob/master/schema.org/ext/periodicals.html I'd also like to move these things along. Original thread started here, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jan/0086.html Are there any open problems with this design? Can I get some +1s from people that believe adding it will be a useful improvement? (not everyone here follows the bibextend list...) cheers, Dan p.s. is the JSON-LD in https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works#JSON-LD_.28experimental.29 ok? (it's marked as experimental) > kc > > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Periodicals,_Articles_and_Multi-volume_Works > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jan/0180.html > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet >
Received on Monday, 7 April 2014 07:49:34 UTC