- From: Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:01:03 +0400
- To: public-vc-edu@w3.org
- Message-ID: <63398edf-65de-e87a-459f-584a7c5287c9@danubetech.com>
This is great. I think the questions about a Verifier tool would be similar as those about Holder wallets in the PlugFest 3 Contact List <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mxu_Ts1a2tQX_4XIDxHyppqIitopsn7v2T0RI8RByAI/>, for example: - Which protocol(s) does your Verifier support for requesting verifiable presentations? - Which DID method(s) do you support? - What is your credential envelope format? (e.g. W3C VC, JWT, Anoncreds, ACDC, ISO mDoc, ...) - What key types do you support? (e.g. Ed25519) - Does your Verifier check Issuer DIDs against a trust registry or other known Issuer list? (which one?) - Does your Verifier support any revocation methods? (e.g. StatusList2021) Markus On 8/14/23 18:49, Sharon Leu wrote: > > Hello vc-edu, > > During PlugFest 3, we will be working to demonstrate interoperability > in the presentation workflow. We are excited that a number of > plugfest participants have expressed interest in developing their > verification tools for our use case. > > Whether or not you are participating in plugfest, our team is > interested in hearing from you about what information you would need > to know about a verification tool in order to be able to successfully > present VPs to that verifier from your wallet solution. For example, > which DID methods, protocols, key type infrastructure, seem important. > Anything else? > > Thanks! > > sharon >
Received on Monday, 14 August 2023 15:01:14 UTC