Re: Tracking Preference Expression - Call for consensus on Last Call

On 2014-04-23 1:58 PM, Justin Brookman wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org 
> <mailto:joe@cdt.org>> wrote:
>
>> On 4/23/14, 11:39 AM, Jack L. Hobaugh Jr wrote:
>>> NAI agrees with this stated principle but the TPE does not provide
>>> the necessary requirements for enforcing this principle within the
>>> protocol or for determining a rogue DNT signal.
>>
>> Has there been any technical discussion of how this might be done? I'm
>> skeptical, as you can imagine. (But as always, hopeful and curious.)
>
> Yes, there has been a fair amount of technical discussion on this 
> (especially at the Sunnyvale face-to-face meeting).  We have so far 
> failed to find a solution that provides complete certainty, though 
> Shane Wiley has proposed one new idea 
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2014Feb/0045.html). 
> On the call today, we recognized this was a key concern for many 
> implementers and committed to keep trying to address this as part of 
> the Last Call process.

Continuing to try is good, but what if it can't be resolved?