W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Agenda for April 23 TPWG call

From: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:23:25 -0400
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <55F58CBB-FF54-42D1-9ED0-7835D823BC54@cdt.org>
To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Yes, that is when I explained (briefly) our decision, but the minutes are not very detailed.  The written decision will provide more analysis.  However, the explanatory memo is just a walkthrough of the Chairs' thinking in evaluating the objections; it doesn't alter the meaning of the words that were ultimately chosen.  The words are what they are.

On Apr 22, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote:

> Thanks Justin. Is this the explanation of the chair's decision re:
> context? http://www.w3.org/2014/03/12-dnt-minutes#item02
> 
> Or are there others?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/22/14 12:55 PM, "Justin Brookman" <jbrookman@cdt.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alan,
>> 
>> We're aiming to distribute the decision on context tonight, but I don't
>> think there's a reason to discuss on the call tomorrow.  The decision has
>> been public (and incorporated into the documents) for some time, and we
>> had explained the rationales for the decisions to the group previously.
>> 
>> On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Alan Chapell
>> <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Ninja. I don't see time allocated for a discussion of the chair's
>>> decision on Context here, although I believe we were told we'd have
>>> something in writing from the chairs this week. Do you know when that
>>> document will be forthcoming? Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Alan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/21/14 5:31 PM, "Ninja Marnau" <ninja@w3.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> AGENDA:
>>>> ----------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome!
>>>> 
>>>> 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------
>>>> --- Issues for this Call ---
>>>> 
>>>> 3. TPE Last Call Working Draft
>>>> 
>>>> We will take up the following two TCS (Tracking Compliance and Scope)
>>>> issues in parallel as they may be related:
>>>> 4.
>>>> TCS ISSUE-134: Would we additionally permit logs that are retained for
>>>> a
>>>> short enough period?
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/134
>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Short_Term
>>>> April 23: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All
>>>> change proposals should be drafted
>>>> 
>>>> 5.
>>>> TCS ISSUE-208: Requirements on unknowing collection, retention and use
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/208
>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Unknowing
>>>> April 23: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All
>>>> change proposals should be drafted
>>>> 
>>>> 6.
>>>> TCS ISSUE-207: Conditions for dis-regarding (or not) DNT signals
>>>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/207
>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Disregarding
>>>> April 23: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been
>>>> submitted;
>>>> Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES
>>>> =================
>>>> 
>>>> PHASES to resolve issues:
>>>> M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change
>>>> proposals should be drafted
>>>> M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted;
>>>> Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
>>>> M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether
>>>> clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
>>>> M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine
>>>> consensus
>>>> M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks
>>>> after
>>>> M3); Analysis starts
>>>> M7 (announcement): Results are announced
>>>> 
>>>> ================ Infrastructure =================
>>>> 
>>>> Zakim teleconference bridge:
>>>> VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
>>>> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
>>>> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt
>>>> 
>>>> OFFLINE caller identification:
>>>> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your
>>>> phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
>>>> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in
>>>> my
>>>> case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not
>>>> comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone
>>>> number,
>>>> please email your name and phone number to
>>>> npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
>>>> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note
>>>> that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to
>>>> off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 17:24:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:22 UTC