Re: Agenda for April 23 TPWG call

Thanks Justin. Is this the explanation of the chair's decision re:
context? http://www.w3.org/2014/03/12-dnt-minutes#item02

Or are there others?

Thanks!

Alan







On 4/22/14 12:55 PM, "Justin Brookman" <jbrookman@cdt.org> wrote:

>Hi Alan,
>
>We're aiming to distribute the decision on context tonight, but I don't
>think there's a reason to discuss on the call tomorrow.  The decision has
>been public (and incorporated into the documents) for some time, and we
>had explained the rationales for the decisions to the group previously.
>
>On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Alan Chapell
><achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ninja. I don't see time allocated for a discussion of the chair's
>> decision on Context here, although I believe we were told we'd have
>> something in writing from the chairs this week. Do you know when that
>> document will be forthcoming? Thanks!
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/21/14 5:31 PM, "Ninja Marnau" <ninja@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> AGENDA:
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome!
>>> 
>>> 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> --- Issues for this Call ---
>>> 
>>> 3. TPE Last Call Working Draft
>>> 
>>> We will take up the following two TCS (Tracking Compliance and Scope)
>>> issues in parallel as they may be related:
>>> 4.
>>> TCS ISSUE-134: Would we additionally permit logs that are retained for
>>>a
>>> short enough period?
>>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/134
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Short_Term
>>> April 23: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All
>>> change proposals should be drafted
>>> 
>>> 5.
>>> TCS ISSUE-208: Requirements on unknowing collection, retention and use
>>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/208
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Unknowing
>>> April 23: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All
>>> change proposals should be drafted
>>> 
>>> 6.
>>> TCS ISSUE-207: Conditions for dis-regarding (or not) DNT signals
>>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/207
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Disregarding
>>> April 23: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been
>>>submitted;
>>> Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES
>>> =================
>>> 
>>> PHASES to resolve issues:
>>> M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change
>>> proposals should be drafted
>>> M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted;
>>> Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
>>> M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether
>>> clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
>>> M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine
>>>consensus
>>> M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks
>>>after
>>> M3); Analysis starts
>>> M7 (announcement): Results are announced
>>> 
>>> ================ Infrastructure =================
>>> 
>>> Zakim teleconference bridge:
>>> VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
>>> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
>>> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt
>>> 
>>> OFFLINE caller identification:
>>> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your
>>> phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
>>> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in
>>>my
>>> case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not
>>> comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone
>>>number,
>>> please email your name and phone number to
>>> npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
>>> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note
>>> that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to
>>> off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 17:10:26 UTC