- From: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:55:38 -0400
- To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Alan, We're aiming to distribute the decision on context tonight, but I don't think there's a reason to discuss on the call tomorrow. The decision has been public (and incorporated into the documents) for some time, and we had explained the rationales for the decisions to the group previously. On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote: > Thanks Ninja. I don't see time allocated for a discussion of the chair's > decision on Context here, although I believe we were told we'd have > something in writing from the chairs this week. Do you know when that > document will be forthcoming? Thanks! > > Alan > > > > > > On 4/21/14 5:31 PM, "Ninja Marnau" <ninja@w3.org> wrote: > >> AGENDA: >> ---------------------------------- >> >> 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome! >> >> 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions) >> >> ---------------------------------- >> --- Issues for this Call --- >> >> 3. TPE Last Call Working Draft >> >> We will take up the following two TCS (Tracking Compliance and Scope) >> issues in parallel as they may be related: >> 4. >> TCS ISSUE-134: Would we additionally permit logs that are retained for a >> short enough period? >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/134 >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Short_Term >> April 23: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All >> change proposals should be drafted >> >> 5. >> TCS ISSUE-208: Requirements on unknowing collection, retention and use >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/208 >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Unknowing >> April 23: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All >> change proposals should be drafted >> >> 6. >> TCS ISSUE-207: Conditions for dis-regarding (or not) DNT signals >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/207 >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Disregarding >> April 23: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; >> Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals >> >> >> >> ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES >> ================= >> >> PHASES to resolve issues: >> M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change >> proposals should be drafted >> M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; >> Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals >> M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether >> clear consensus emerges for one change proposal >> M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus >> M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after >> M3); Analysis starts >> M7 (announcement): Results are announced >> >> ================ Infrastructure ================= >> >> Zakim teleconference bridge: >> VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org >> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) >> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt >> >> OFFLINE caller identification: >> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your >> phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call >> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my >> case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not >> comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, >> please email your name and phone number to >> npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact, >> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note >> that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to >> off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call. >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 16:56:14 UTC