W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2013

ISSUE-25 research exception

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:34:10 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org, peter@peterswire.net
Cc: Kathy Joe <kathy@esomar.org>
Message-ID: <2278879.TH8SbONuVO@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

I think this ball is in ESOMAR's court. AFAIK, this was tracked under 
ISSUE-25. Perhaps we attach a new action to ISSUE-25 if the chairs re-
open that issue. 

Because currently ISSUE-25 is marked as pending review. So from a formal 
point of view and taking into account what Aleecia said: If ESOMAR does 
not come up with a suggested wording for the Specification, the chairs 
are free to close ISSUE-25 and thus finish the current review. 


On Wednesday 20 February 2013 16:02:52 Kathy Joe wrote:
> Thanks for the input. The proposal is to come up with a narrow
> research exception as previous definitions were too broad,
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 19:34:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:22 UTC