- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:34:10 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org, peter@peterswire.net
- Cc: Kathy Joe <kathy@esomar.org>
Kathy, I think this ball is in ESOMAR's court. AFAIK, this was tracked under ISSUE-25. Perhaps we attach a new action to ISSUE-25 if the chairs re- open that issue. Because currently ISSUE-25 is marked as pending review. So from a formal point of view and taking into account what Aleecia said: If ESOMAR does not come up with a suggested wording for the Specification, the chairs are free to close ISSUE-25 and thus finish the current review. --Rigo On Wednesday 20 February 2013 16:02:52 Kathy Joe wrote: > Thanks for the input. The proposal is to come up with a narrow > research exception as previous definitions were too broad,
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 19:34:37 UTC